Skip to Content
Naegle Law Firm Naegle Law Firm
Call Us Today! 480-245-5550
Top

Our Case Results

Over the course of more than 13 years in practice, our founding attorney, Charlie Naegle, has achieved numerous favorable verdicts on behalf of clients accused of all types of crimes. Even in the face of seemingly significant evidence, our firm has helped individuals secure reduced charge, lessened penalties, and outright acquittals. While we, nor any attorney, can guarantee an outcome for any given case, we can promise to do everything in our power to fight for you and your rights. No matter the charges you are facing, we are here to help you get back on track.

Browse our case results to see how we’ve helped others in situations similar to yours. Then, get in touch with us for a free, confidential consultation with an experienced and compassionate criminal defense attorney in Mesa.

  • Full Acquittal

    Disorderly Conduct

    Continue Reading
  • Case Dismissed

    Interference with a Judicial Order of Protection

    Continue Reading
  • Not Guilty

    Two Counts of DUI

    Continue Reading
  • Charges Reduced – License Saved

    Underage DUI

    Continue Reading
  • Jury Trial – Not Guilty

    Unlawful Flight from Law Enforcement

    Continue Reading
  • Jury Trial – Not Guilty on All Counts

    Several Felony Charges

    Continue Reading
  • Case Dismissed

    DUI

    Continue Reading
  • Charges Reduced

    DUI

    Continue Reading
  • Pre-Indictment Dismissal

    Aggravated Assault

    Continue Reading
  • Case Reduced to Civil Fine

    Criminal Speeding

    Continue Reading
  • State v. J.L

    Client was charged with disorderly conduct. At trial we argued that the victim did not specifically testify during direct examination that her peace and quiet was disturbed. We strategically chose not to cross examine the victim which precluded the prosecutor from asking any questions on redirect. We argued for a Rule 20 summary judgment and the judge agreed and dismissed the case at the close of the State’s evidence resulting in a full acquittal.

  • State v. M.L.
    Client was charged with underage DUI which would have resulted in a 2 year license suspension if she was convicted. We argued to the prosecutor that we believed there was an illegal stop by the officer. Result: the charge was reduced to a minor consumption charge in lieu of arguing the motion to suppress. Client’s license was saved.
  • Case Dismissed. Sate v. D.J.
    The Defendant was charged with two cases both involving interference with a judicial order of protection on two separate occasions. Counsel made argument that the state could not prove that the defendant made the alleged phone calls due to the fact that the victim did not answer the phone calls.
  • Case dismissed State V. Mr. MB
    Assault as a domestic violence offense.
    Showed the prosecutor there was no way that a fist punch could have caused a perfectly straight cut on the victim. Also proved the victim had a history of threatening bodily harm to herself with a knife. It was shown that within an hour after client was arrested, police were called due to victim threatening herself with a knife again.
  • Case dismissed State V. Mr. JN
    Argued the pills that were found in his possession by police were actually prescribed to the clients ailing mother and the client was the sole caretaker of his mother.
  • Case dismissed State V. Mr. JN
    Argued the pills that were found in his possession by police were actually prescribed to the clients ailing mother and the client was the sole caretaker of his mother.
  • Case was dismissed prior to trial State V. Ms. PS
    Ms. PS was charged with littering. Argued the officer never picked up the item allegedly thrown out of the vehicle.
  • Supervised probation without a jail term. State V. Mr. B.
    Prior to hiring the Naegle Law Firm, Mr. B. was offered mandatory prison as a plea agreement. After we were hired the result was supervised probation without a jail term.
  • Jury Trial, Not Guilty on all Charges State V. Mr. W.
    Kidnapping F2, Attempted Sexual Assault F3
  • Pre-Indictment Dismissal State V. Mr. A.
    Aggravated Assault on a Police Officer F3
  • Dismissed by court after argument was made that State V. Mr. S.
    Transportation of Marijuana F2, Possession of Marijuana for Sale F2
  • Dismissed by court after argument was made that State V. Mr. S.
    Transportation of Marijuana F2, Possession of Marijuana for Sale F2

  • Pre-Indictment Dismissal State V. Ms. S.
    Aggravated Taking the Identity of Another

  • Dismissed State V. Mr. R.
    Aggravated Assault on a Police Officer F6
  • Jury Trial, Not Guilty State V. Mr. B.
    Unlawful Flight From Law Enforcement F5
  • Jury Trial, Not Guilty State V. Mr. R.
    Misconduct Involving Weapons F4
  • Jury Trial, Not Guilty on all Counts State V. Mr. P.
    Aggravated Assault F6, Resist Arrest F6
  • Misdemeanor with no jail term State V. Mr. H.

    Burglary F4

    Client had 3 prior felony convictions original plea was for prison.
    We fought and got case reduced to a Misdemeanor with no jail term.

  • Probation with no additional jail term State V. Mr. G.

    3 Counts of Endangerment F6 Dangerous
    Discharging a Firearm at a residential Structure F2 Dangerous
    Participating in a Criminal Street Gang F3 Dangerous
    Drive by Shooting F2 Dangerous

    Prior to our representation the plea offer was 10 years.
    We fought and got client Probation with no additional jail term.

  • Pre-Indictment Dismissal State V. Mr. S.
    Criminal Damage M1
    Disorderly Conduct Dangerous F6
  • Dismissed day of trial State V. Ms. F.
    Assault – Domestic Violence
  • Dismissed State V. Mr. M.
    Aggravated DUI F4
  • Jury Trial, Not Guilty on All Counts State V. Mr. F.P.
    5 Counts Aggravated Assault – Dangerous
    4 Counts Threat to Initmidate – Dangerous
    Street Gang
    3 Counts Endangerment – Dangerous
    Discharge of Firearm at Structure

  • Not Guilty State V. J.C.

    Client was charged with two counts of DUI:
    1. Being in actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of a drug while impaired to the slightest degree.
    2. Being in actual physical control of a vehicle while there is any drug or its metabolite in the person’s body.

    The second charge was dismissed by defense motion prior to trial and after a two day jury trial the client was found not guilty on the remaining charge.

  • Not Guilty State V. Mr. P
    Client was charged with Assault and Disorderly Conduct.
    Argued self defense and the client was found Not Guilty on both counts after trial.
  • Reduced to Reckless Driving State v. V.S.
    The Defendant was charged with DUI. Counsel argued that defendant was not impaired to the slightest degree from the amount of alcohol in her system.
  • Case Dismissed State v. P.F.
    The Defendant was charged with Assault on a coworker. Counsel argued no reasonable likelihood of conviction based upon mutual combat.
  • Case Dismissed State v. P.F.
    The Defendant was charged with Domestic Violence Assault. Counsel argued no reasonable likelihood of conviction based upon witness issues.
  • Case reduced to civil fine State v. J.B.
    Criminal Speeding on the highway.
  • Case Dismissed State v. J.R.
    The Defendant was charged with DUI. Counsel argued that defendant was not impaired to the slightest degree from the amount of alcohol in his system.