Our Case Results
Over the course of more than 13 years in practice, our founding attorney, Charlie Naegle, has achieved numerous favorable verdicts on behalf of clients accused of all types of crimes. Even in the face of seemingly significant evidence, our firm has helped individuals secure reduced charge, lessened penalties, and outright acquittals. While we, nor any attorney, can guarantee an outcome for any given case, we can promise to do everything in our power to fight for you and your rights. No matter the charges you are facing, we are here to help you get back on track.
Browse our case results to see how we’ve helped others in situations similar to yours. Then, get in touch with us for a free, confidential consultation with an experienced and compassionate criminal defense attorney in Mesa.
Client was charged with disorderly conduct. At trial we argued that the victim did not specifically testify during direct examination that her peace and quiet was disturbed. We strategically chose not to cross examine the victim which precluded the prosecutor from asking any questions on redirect. We argued for a Rule 20 summary judgment and the judge agreed and dismissed the case at the close of the State’s evidence resulting in a full acquittal.
Interference with a Judicial Order of ProtectionThe Defendant was charged with two cases both involving interference with a judicial order of protection on two separate occasions. Counsel made argument that the state could not prove that the defendant made the alleged phone calls due to the fact that the victim did not answer the phone calls.
Two Counts of DUI
Client was charged with two counts of DUI:
1. Being in actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of a drug while impaired to the slightest degree.
2. Being in actual physical control of a vehicle while there is any drug or its metabolite in the person’s body.
The second charge was dismissed by defense motion prior to trial and after a two-day jury trial the client was found not guilty on the remaining charge.
Charges Reduced – License Saved
Client was charged with underage DUI which would have resulted in a 2 year license suspension if she was convicted. We argued to the prosecutor that we believed there was an illegal stop by the officer.
Result: the charge was reduced to a minor consumption charge in lieu of arguing the motion to suppress. Client’s license was saved.
Jury Trial – Not Guilty
Unlawful Flight from Law EnforcementUnlawful Flight From Law Enforcement F5
Jury Trial – Not Guilty on All Counts
Several Felony Charges
Client charged with the following:
- 5 Counts Aggravated Assault – Dangerous
- 4 Counts Threat to Initmidate – Dangerous Street Gang
- 3 Counts Endangerment – Dangerous
- Discharge of Firearm at Structure
The Defendant was charged with DUI. Counsel argued that defendant was not impaired to the slightest degree from the amount of alcohol in his system.
Pinal County Justice Court. Client was charged with DUI .096
Reduced to Reckless Driving
Aggravated AssaultAggravated Assault on a Police Officer F3
Case Reduced to Civil Fine
Criminal SpeedingClient was charged with criminal speeding while driving on a highway.